Thread context
4 posts in path
Root
@WandererUber@poa.st
Open
@WandererUber@poa.st
@BowsacNoodle @BrokenSword How is it not being a science enjoyer when that guy is literally a renowned scientist and the OP is a scientific discovery? Don't get this at all
Ancestor 2
@BowsacNoodle@poa.st
Open
@BowsacNoodle@poa.st
@WandererUber @BrokenSword Science with a capital S is a religion in denial
Parent
@WandererUber@poa.st
Open
@WandererUber@poa.st
@BowsacNoodle @BrokenSword oh okay so what you were saying is basically that you "switched religions" then. Makes sense
Distributist. Interested in philosophy and meta critiques. Myer's Briggs says I like to argue. I try to chat in good faith and assume the same from you until proven otherwise. Love, laugh, grill. Jesus Christ is Lord. Matthew 28:19-20.
poa.st
Distributist. Interested in philosophy and meta critiques. Myer's Briggs says I like to argue. I try to chat in good faith and assume the same from you until proven otherwise. Love, laugh, grill. Jesus Christ is Lord. Matthew 28:19-20.
poa.st
@BowsacNoodle@poa.st
·
2d ago
@WandererUber @BrokenSword In a way. It’s not an attack on the scientific method or empirical evidence and theory, but of “belief in Science“ as if it’s something that depends upon our belief in it. Hard to explain, but you know it when you see it. For example, watching people go full retard over untested vaccines and honest questions of their efficacy.
View full thread on poa.st